![]() Unlike most everyday household items Rebecca would always need it available so she can’t share it with others. ![]() In these cases, the tablet is essential so Rebecca can interact with others or do daily tasks. Rebecca’s speech pathologist will need to give her written evidence that shows it’s the most appropriate solution for her communication needs. We may fund a tablet if Rebecca uses an alternative communication device as her only way to communicate. Rebecca would need to give us written evidence that shows the cost of the electronic device is an extra cost that is solely and directly because of her disability needs.įor example, she needs to magnify or read out print or other images because she has a significant vision impairment, and her orthoptist or occupational therapist give evidence this is the best solution. In some situations, we may fund smart devices such as tablets. To work out whether a support is reasonable and necessary for Rebecca, we look at the information she gives us against the NDIS funding criteria. Even if Rebecca needs the tablet because of another funded support, it’s likely to be a cost she would have anyway, because most Australian households have smart devices that can be used for this reason. These are both everyday items and considered a day-to-day cost. Most households have other options, such as a mobile phone or a personal computer, which would get the same result. ![]() A household appliance that most people are likely to have at home is a day-to-day living cost, not funded by the NDIS.Įven if Rebecca’s disability means she may benefit from the help of a smart device or personal computer, these devices are unlikely to be an extra living cost due solely and directly as a result of her disability needs. Most Australian homes have them, and they are used by most of the community. Smart devices and computers are a general household appliance. to be a cost related to another funded support, and if it is related to another support, it’s likely to be a cost Rebecca would have anyway.to be an extra living cost due solely and directly as a result of her disability needs.There are some exceptions to this rule, but a tablet is unlikely: No, we wouldn’t typically fund a tablet for Rebecca as it is a common day-to-day living cost for many Australians, including people with disability. She supports her funding request with a letter from her therapist. Rebecca asks us to fund a smart device, such as an iPad, as her therapist has recommended a number of apps to help her manage her disability.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |